Stalk us here
Powered by Fresh Ideas

California Judge Rules on Cove Soda's Sweetener Label Dispute

Source: www.law360.com
23 EN 中文 DE FR عربى
A federal judge in California has decided that Cove Drinks Inc., a zero-sugar probiotic soda brand, must face claims that its labeling misleads consumers about using only natural sweeteners. The litigation will continue as the court found it premature to determine if an ingredient in question is artificial.

A California federal judge has ruled that Cove Drinks Inc. cannot dismiss the claims that its product labels mislead consumers into believing that the zero-sugar probiotic sodas contain only natural sweeteners. The court's decision marks a continuation of the legal proceedings.

The issue arose over a particular ingredient used in Cove's sodas, with allegations suggesting it might be artificial despite the labels stating "No Artificial Sweeteners." The judge indicated that it is too early to conclude on the nature of the ingredient, allowing the litigation to advance to further stages where more evidence can be assessed.

See you at Gulfood Manufacturing 2026, November 3–5, Dubai World Trade Center, Hall: Concourse 2, Stand CC7-2.

Meet the Zestnews.today team for a short interview and get your company featured on Zestnews.today. It’s a chance to share your products, innovations and plans with food and beverage industry readers.

Book your interview: https://cal.com/fiorella-herrera-yemdiu/gulfood-exhibition


Law360 reported on the case, noting that this decision emphasizes the vigilance required in product labeling, particularly regarding health-related claims. Cove Drinks, known for marketing beverages that appeal to health-conscious consumers, now faces scrutiny over the accuracy of its marketing practices.

This case is being closely watched due to its potential implications for the broader functional beverage sector, as companies must ensure compliance with labeling regulations. Further developments in this lawsuit are anticipated as both parties prepare their respective cases.